News:

Check out the newsletters posted at our main club site:  http://57fordsforever.com

Main Menu

Stock height of 1957 frame

Started by TRoper, 2026-05-15 11:58

Previous topic - Next topic

TRoper

Hi All,

Just curious, I am trying to install a triangulated 4 bar suspension and the directions say to put the frame to stock height and level.  What is the stock height of the frame?

Thanks

Edd505

someone has to know the answer my 57 out for paint
57 Custom 300 2dr 312 4V     58 Custom 2dr w/57 nose & 57 rear
94 Eddie Bauer Bronco 5.8      94 F150 EC LB 5.8
2012 F150 CCSB )hers)   2022 F350 6.7 CCLB (his)

None of us is as smart as all of us.

gasman826

I don't have the service manual in front of me, but I remember the frame specs are in the manual.  I always set the frame to my planned ride height.   

RICH MUISE

#3
I'm guessing most don't know what the original height was, and are thinking their ride may not be as original, mine definetly isn't. I just kept working the ride height/rake until I got what looked good to me.
With that said, I'm confused by the apparent concern of "stock height and level" the directions call for. What if the final ride height was not to be level, as Gasman suggested above.
with that said, I don't know diddly about what you're doing, but Gasman does.
I can do this, I can do this, I, well, maybe

mustang6984

Quote from: gasman826 on 2026-05-16 07:56I don't have the service manual in front of me, but I remember the frame specs are in the manual.  I always set the frame to my planned ride height.   

With this info...I will consult my manual...and see if I can find the info.
Nothing is impossible...
The word it's self says I'M POSSIBLE  (Audrey Hepburn)

2 '57 Ford Couriers AND '57 Fairlane
3 Mustangs, '69 fastback-'84 SVO-'88 Saleen Convertible
'49 Ford P/U
'50 Dodge P/U
'82 RX-7
'65 Chrysler New Yorker

mustang6984

Okay...this is what I found...Gary...is this what I needed to show?
Nothing is impossible...
The word it's self says I'M POSSIBLE  (Audrey Hepburn)

2 '57 Ford Couriers AND '57 Fairlane
3 Mustangs, '69 fastback-'84 SVO-'88 Saleen Convertible
'49 Ford P/U
'50 Dodge P/U
'82 RX-7
'65 Chrysler New Yorker

abe_lugo

#6
You would have to have non saggy springs and 14" wheels with 8.00-14 tires
Even my wagon seems a bit lower thank stock. 

I think for the front there was a measurement post. 

For the rear. It depends whether it's CS or Rachero or even sedan or Fairlane.  They might all be a little different.

I know the rear spring pack is different for wagons and ranchero from the cars so it might put the chassis at a different height. 

 
 
Abe      Los Angeles, CA  IN Los Angeles proper. 90008

gasman826

Quote from: mustang6984 on 2026-05-16 16:38Okay...this is what I found...Gary...is this what I needed to show?
Yes...this is what I used.  Another source would be the alignment specs.  The ride height is usually documented...at least for the front.  I think 'desired ride height' should be substituted for 'stock height'.  Tire size and stance are critical to the plan.  4-link angles are forgiving but are more critical as performance levels increase.

RICH MUISE

Just a thought.....maybe by "leveling" they were referring to the width rather than the legth. That would make sense.
I can do this, I can do this, I, well, maybe