News:

Check out the newsletters posted at our main club site:  http://57fordsforever.com

Main Menu

Coil Over Installation

Started by DonC, 2026-06-23 07:56

Previous topic - Next topic

DonC

Hey Guys,
I am new to the board and don't currently own a 57 Ford but have a few older friends with them that are not internet savvy and I do help them work on their cars time to time. I am hoping I can get some information and or opinions from the guys here who know these cars well. On to the question at hand.
My buddy owns a 57 Country Squire Station Wagon, he's looking to install coil-overs in the front of the wagon. I told him he should reinforce at a minimum the front control arms where the shocks mount because the control arms are not designed to support the entire weight of the car in that one small area. The springs spread the weight of the car pretty evenly in the spring pocket. I'm concerned the A-arm will eventually just break with all of the weight concentrated in the shock mount area. Really looking for someone who has installed coil-overs and used a stock A-arm and if no one has what is your opinion on mounting coil-overs to a stock A-Arm.

gasman826

Call Ride Tech, QA1 or one of the other suspension vendors.  Some 'kits' have A-arm re-enforcement recommendations.

Gene

I can not believe I am going to say this.  However, would air-bags be a smarter and easier way to go?
Gene   
57 Skyliner
1928 Model-A
1967 ElCamino
1936 Plymouth streetrod

gasman826

Ride Tech makes a air bag kit.  Several years ago, I put one in my Custom.

DonC

Quote from: Gene on 2026-06-23 14:55I can not believe I am going to say this.  However, would air-bags be a smarter and easier way to go?
They would work on the stock A-arms I suspect since the load would be spread out like a spring does.

gasman826

The top and bottom of the airbag has attached threaded plates.  The kit has a re-enforcement plate to weld into the lower control arm.

thomasso

And what would be gained by coilovers in place of springs and shocks with otherwise stock components other than problems?
57 E Code Black 76B   55 Willys Aero   63 Rivera   99 Lightning  1- XK8 Convs.   05 Vanden Plas  etc.

Gene

gasman, every time I hear the word weld I think no way.  Doesn't matter what it is.
Gene   
57 Skyliner
1928 Model-A
1967 ElCamino
1936 Plymouth streetrod

DonC

Quote from: thomasso on 2026-06-23 23:53And what would be gained by coilovers in place of springs and shocks with otherwise stock components other than problems?
coil-overs make ride height super easy too adjust. The shock side of the coil overs has 18 adjustments for compression and rebound to get the ride you like.

ATambo

Hi Don,
Have you installed coil-overs on a 57 yet? I'm very interested and feel the same about the ease of ride height and ride quality. Viking has a huge variety and seems to have a good name. what other input can you offer?
thanks,tony

abe_lugo

My buddy has or had a set of custom a-arms that were tube and might been made to work with coil overs. 
I wound say the bushing at the rear of both a-arms should be reinforced. 
Abe      Los Angeles, CA  IN Los Angeles proper. 90008

KULTULZ

Quote from: DonC on 2026-06-23 07:56I told him he should reinforce at a minimum the front control arms where the shocks mount because the control arms are not designed to support the entire weight of the car in that one small area. The springs spread the weight of the car pretty evenly in the spring pocket. I'm concerned the A-arm will eventually just break with all of the weight concentrated in the shock mount area.

No, you are correct, whether using an OEM or modified OEM lower arm.

The pocket opening should reinforced (IMO) and allowance made for weather drain if heavily street driven.

https://www.speedwaymotors.com/Tubular-Lower-Control-Arm-Coilover-Reinforcement-Plate,343193.html
MEL DIVISION - 1958-1960

MERCURY - EDSEL - LINCOLN